Why is Economics So Important for Public Managers ?

Government Officers and Policy Makers Must Understand Economic Principles to do their Job

Why is Economics So Important for Public Managers ?
Image Source - Wikimedia Commons (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:FEMA_-_43019_-_FEMA_National_Advistory_Council_meets_in_Washington,_DC.jpg)
The modern human beings are so engrossed in economic activities that the human species can now be named as Homo Sapiens Economicus. In this economic universe, Governments have a huge responsibility to regulate economic activities of the people in a way that maximizes the welfare of the people. To be able to achieve this goal, those dealing with public management in the Government as well as outside it need to fully understand the basic principles of economics, and how government interventions affect economic outcomes.

Human world in the 21st century is dominated so much by economic aims and objectives that it is not possible for anyway to succeed in any enterprise without understanding economic principles. Corporate economics for business personnel is relatively simpler because of a clear and measurable goal of profit maximization. The same, however, cannot be said about the public executive or manager, who deals with a goal of broader welfare of people. In particular, the role of policy makers, who must design Government interventions that bring least obstruction to the economic activities and still maximize welfare of people, is largely dependent upon their economic maneuverability.

What is Economics?

There are many different ways in which Economics as an academic stream has been defined. Without going into a debate of which ones of them are acceptable, and which are not, we will like to have a simple definition that will facilitate public managers in understanding its principles and their relevance for governance and regulation. The following definition serves this objective:

ECONOMICS is the study of human behavior related to consumption, production and exchange of economic goods

The various terms used in this definition would need some elaboration to ensure there is no confusion about their meaning.

The term ‘economic goods’ refers here to all those articles, tangible or intangible, substantive or perceived, which can potentially improve the wellbeing of a human being. Some examples of tangible goods are food, water, clothes, machines, gadgets, perfumes, land, fertilizers, utensils, show pieces, coal and bricks. Examples of intangible goods are brands, story, news, goodwill, rights, security, justice and include all kinds of services like cleaning, healthcare, education, broking, representation, legal advice, financial management and plumbing.

In modern world, there are an increasing number of economic goods that border on the tangible and intangible. Most important of them is money – it is intangible because it can be there without any physical existence, as when in your bank account, or loaded on your card, yet it can also be considered tangible because it may represent, in essence, real resources that are very much tangible, like gold. Whether one considers it as tangible or intangible is, fortunately for us, not the question here. All that we wish need to understand is the fact that economic goods include services as well as intangibles. 

Economics is human behavior regarding Economic Goods

Human behavior is probably the least understood of all things that mankind has ever observed, an irony that gets pronounced by the thought that the great human minds who wish to master the world have often been utterly at a loss to make sense of their own behavior. To understand our behavior, we need to conduct studies on what people like us do in similar circumstances – an enquiry that falls within the domain of psychologists. As far as Economics is considered, it is enough to understand the human behavior regarding economic goods.

A definition of economics as study of human behavior can make it vulnerable to the allegation that such a definition would be more apt for Behavioral Economics, a subset of Economics, and yet in the light of more recent developments in the field of economics, including the financial crisis of 2007 and the recent Nobel Awards in Economists to those dealing with economic behavior, it becomes apparent that human behavior now stands at the core of Economics, and for any public manager and policy maker who wishes to control and regulate the economy of the nation, there is no option but to understand economics in terms of human behavior.

When it comes to behavior, it must be appreciated that it has two components – first and the foremost is the decision making, the decision to consume or not, to produce or not and to exchange or not. The second is the execution of that decision. Both are closely entwined, yet two separate entities.

Microeconomics Vs Macroeconomics

The study of one individual’s behavior is termed Microeconomics, while that of large masses is Macroeconomics. Economic principles first need to be understood in terms of Microeconomics, and subsequently applied by the public manager in terms of Macroeconomics, hence it becomes very important that those who wish to make use of its principles understand not only both, but also their inter-relationship and dependence.

Difference of Approach between Corporate Economics & Public Economics

For a Firm, most economic decision-making will be part of its financial management, which can sometimes blur the distinction between economics and finance.  However, for a Public Manager, it is usually not so, for the simple reason that public institutions, whether they are part of government or the market, do not come in to existence for maximizing profits. They exist primarily to maximize the welfare of their citizens. This is a defining distinction between a public manager and a corporate executive.

For a Public manager, then, a decision regarding production, consumption or exchange is unlikely to be based on the objective of maximizing of profits. He will need to take his decisions knowing broader repercussions of his actions on the well-being of the society. Thus, unlike the Manager of a Firm, for the Public Manager, Economics is a subject that goes much beyond Financial Management. Without undermining the importance of finances in any way, since they are one of his major resource, a public manager has to be aware of all economic principles, and needs to be highly adept at using them in a manner that helps him in achieving his objective of social welfare maximization.

To achieve his goals, a Public Manager needs to know a lot more than the price of goods he is dealing with. He must know the value of those goods as also their cost. While price is readily available in financial terms, neither value nor cost is readily available in financial terms, and must be discerned and quantified according to economic principles such as marginal utility and opportunity costs.

Appreciating this distinction between economics and finance and its relevance is the first lesson that every public manager must learn!

Let us know how you like this article. Like it and Rate it below.
329 3
5 stars - by 3 user(s)

Related Articles

An organization helps in performing tasks for achieving the goals of the organization.This article speaks discusses the characteristics of a healthy organization..

Demographic Dividend is a phenomenon whereby falling number of dependents and growing workforce provides an opportunity for high rate of economic growth. However, not every country is able to make the best use of such an opportunity.

The term capitalism is commonly known in the business and industry sector of the country. It is defined as an economic system or model to which majority of the commerce, trade and businesses in a particular country are being owned by private individuals or businessmen.